index e2ec93d..f22ecad 100644
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ the thinking pattern generalizes far beyond geometry:
- in identity: what stays the same about *you* when your circumstances change? those invariants are your core values or personality traits.
- in systems design: what properties of your system must be preserved under scaling, modification, or failure? those are your architectural invariants.
-identifying invariants is one of the most useful skills in abstract reasoning — it's the same instinct that drives [[structural/symmetry-and-groups|group theory]], which asks what transformations preserve structure. it tells you what's essential vs what's accidental.
+identifying invariants is one of the most useful skills in abstract reasoning — it's the same instinct that drives [[symmetry-and-groups|group theory]], which asks what transformations preserve structure. it tells you what's essential vs what's accidental.
## connectedness and paths
@@ -64,10 +64,10 @@ two problems are "topologically equivalent" if you can continuously deform one i
this is liberating. instead of asking "what is the exact answer?" you ask "what *kind* of answer is it?" instead of "how big is the hole?" you ask "is there a hole at all?" instead of measuring precisely, you classify structurally.
-this connects to [[structural/set-theory-as-thinking|set theory]] (classification by type) and contrasts with [[structural/calculus-as-thinking|calculus]] (exact measurement of change). topology says: before you compute, understand the shape of the problem.
+this connects to [[set-theory-as-thinking|set theory]] (classification by type) and contrasts with [[calculus-as-thinking|calculus]] (exact measurement of change). topology says: before you compute, understand the shape of the problem.
## the deep point
topology teaches you to ask: what's essential? what survives deformation? what are the invariants? these questions — applied to problems, organizations, systems, or ideas — cut through surface complexity to reveal underlying structure.
-the coffee cup = donut insight isn't trivial. it's a lesson in [[structural/abstraction-as-power|abstraction]]: sometimes two things that look completely different are structurally identical, and sometimes two things that look similar are structurally different. topology gives you the tools to tell which is which.
\ No newline at end of file
+the coffee cup = donut insight isn't trivial. it's a lesson in [[abstraction-as-power|abstraction]]: sometimes two things that look completely different are structurally identical, and sometimes two things that look similar are structurally different. topology gives you the tools to tell which is which.
\ No newline at end of file