Edit wiki/mentorship/the-stocks-metaphor.md — Work Reflections

---
visibility: public-edit
---

# acceleration > position: growth compounds like investments

this metaphor came out of the [[agency talk|agency-talk]] and it stuck with me harder than almost anything else.

## the original framing

a cofounder at the startup explained the org's mentality like this:

> "think about it like stocks: money grows up and up and cost to buy things goes down and down. skills + mentality goes up and up and cost to do things goes down and down."

the point: acceleration matters more than position. where you are right now is less important than how fast you're moving and in what direction.

he backed it up: "we have grown so much. if we started over with nothing, we could get back to this in 2-3 months." the assets weren't the code, the hardware, the office. the assets were the people and their rate of improvement.

## why this reframes everything

before hearing this, i was obsessed with position. what have i done? what can i show? what's on my resume? the stocks metaphor flips that:

- a person who's mediocre but accelerating is worth more than a person who's great but plateaued
- the "stuff that the interns are doing, we could probably do in 1/20 of the time" — the interns' output wasn't the point. their growth rate was.
- when the cofounder first joined, he was doing wiring work that the electrical engineers could have done faster. he didn't care. he was there to compound.

## how i applied it

### dropping todo items

once i internalized this, i started [[prioritizing differently|prioritization]]. the question became: "does this accelerate me?" not "is this productive?"

- reflecting on a mediocre math camp vs reflecting on the startup experience — obvious choice
- going to a finance essentials program vs going deeper on the work right in front of me — obvious choice
- working on personal projects during a once-in-a-lifetime immersive experience — obvious mistake

### evaluating people

the stocks metaphor also changed how i think about who to spend time with. "once you find a node, don't let go. good nodes bring you in flows of people." the question isn't whether someone is impressive right now — it's whether they're on a steep curve.

### compounding skills

"to increase output over time, do skills that compound." the CEO put it bluntly: "people think growth is dumb — no way people are growing 20% per week. but actually look at pioneers, they output insane amounts."

the meta-skills that compound fastest:
- navigating new environments
- leading a team
- learning new things
- reading people and situations

these aren't domain skills. they're multipliers on everything else.

## the dark side

this framing can be addictive. when everything is about acceleration, it's easy to devalue rest, relationships, and anything that doesn't obviously compound. i've had to learn that [[energy management|energy-hacks]] and [[social connection|social-wins]] are themselves compounding investments, not distractions from the real work.

also: the metaphor can breed arrogance. "the world is pretty shit, most of the people are pretty shit" — that's the elitist version of this idea, and while there's a kernel of truth in setting high standards, it's easy to lose empathy along the way.

a friend put it well: "friends ground you." the same people who taught me about acceleration also needed others to keep them from flying off the rails.

---

*see also: [[agency talk|agency-talk]], [[prioritization|prioritization]], [[mindset shifts|mindset-shifts]]*