new file mode 100644
index 0000000..46ea344
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+---
+title: Framing — "the God data structure"
+type: framing
+visibility: public
+first-used: 2025-10-XX
+audience: builders
+sources:
+ - raw/slack-explainingideaflow-2022-2026.md#2025-10
+related:
+ - wiki/framings/medium-for-thought.md
+ - wiki/framings/open-source-knowledge-graphs.md
+ - wiki/canonical-terms.md
+---
+
+# "the God data structure"
+
+## The line
+
+Jacob, October 2025:
+
+> "Ultimately, we're creating **the God data structure**. Our God data structure should be able to contain everything in the world. (Eg. Google Maps paths and regions, category theory etc.) `#RearchitectingTheWeb` — building the **Gopher backbone**."
+
+## Why it works (when it works)
+
+1. **Maximalist by design.** IdeaFlow's data model wants to be expressive enough to represent spatial regions, mathematical categories, social relationships, and everyday text. The phrase telegraphs the ambition.
+2. **Developer-legible.** "God object" is a known (anti-)pattern in OO. The flip of the anti-pattern into a feature is intentional — *what's wrong in code is right in data model*, at the right scope.
+3. **Paired with GraphMirror / Gopher backbone.** The "substrate-of-substrates" framing. ProseMirror is a text editor primitive; GraphMirror would be the graph editor primitive.
+
+## Why it's risky
+
+- Reads cult-adjacent out of context.
+- Overpromises if the actual data model hasn't demonstrated that level of expressiveness yet.
+- Flagged in [[../open-questions]] (item 6) as a *"trap."*
+
+## Where it sits
+
+- **Layer:** substrate (all layers sit on it).
+- **Audience:** builders, systems-thinkers, database people.
+- **Register:** in-group. Not recommended in public pitches without editorial framing.
+
+## What it pairs with
+
+- [[medium-for-thought]] — the less risky version of the same ambition.
+- [[open-source-knowledge-graphs]] — the political stance toward the God data structure (it's public infrastructure, not proprietary).
+- [[neocortex-for-the-global-brain]] — the same maximalism at the system level.
+
+## Editorial note
+
+This page keeps Jacob's phrasing verbatim per his decision (see [[../meta/design-history]]). It also flags the risks so future editors can decide when to invoke it and when to reach for a softer framing.
+
+## Related
+
+- [[../open-questions]] (item 6)
+- [[../canonical-terms]] (Data-model terms)