Here is the most simple Differential Equation one could imagine:

\begin{equation} \dv{x}{t} = f(t,x) \end{equation}

Or, perhaps, we have a second order differential equation which is the same thing but in the second degree:

\begin{equation} \dv[2]{x}{t} = f\left(t,x,\dv{x}{t}\right) \end{equation}

Then in which case, we have that the first most simple type of differential equation to be as follows:

\begin{equation} \dv{x}{t} = x(t) \end{equation}

If we can solve this, we can generalize this to most of other First-Order Differential Equations. where, the function f(t,x)=x(t).

\begin{align} & \dv{x}{t} = x(t) \\ \Rightarrow\ & \frac{1}{x(t)}\dd{x} = \dd{t} \end{align}

At this point, you may ask yourself, why not construct it such that we have \dd{x} = x(t)\dd{t}? Well, its because our x is a variable in t, so if we constructed it that way we’d have to integrate a function \dd{t} with usub and the reverse chain rule, etc. etc. If we are instead integrating it on \dd{x}, it becomes much easier because our variable of interest no longer considers the t. Continuing on, then:

\begin{align} &\frac{1}{x(t)}\dd{x} = \dd{t} \\ \Rightarrow\ &\int \frac{1}{x(t)}\dd{x} = \int \dd{t} \\ \Rightarrow\ & \ln (x(t)) = t \\ \Rightarrow\ & x(t) = e^{t} \end{align}

Awesome. It should’t be hard also to see that, generally:

\begin{equation} x(t) = e^{ct} \end{equation}

is the solution to all equations \dv{x}{t} = cx. Turns out (not proven in the book), this holds for complex valued equations as well. So, we have some:

\begin{align} &x(t) = e^{it} \\ \Rightarrow\ & \dv{x}{t} = ix \end{align}

Of course, from elementary calculus we also learned the fact that e^{x} can be represented as a power series; so check that out for now we connect it. This equation leads us to solve:

\begin{equation} \dv{x}{t} + ax = b(t) \end{equation}

In order to do this, we neeed to find a replacement of the property that:

\begin{equation} \dv t\left(e^{at}x\right) = e^{at}\left(\dv{x}{t} +at\right) \end{equation}

A more general result of the above form is

\begin{equation} \dv{x}{t} + a(t)x = b(t) \end{equation}

This is fine, but now we need to leverage to chain rule to have \dv t a(t) would be simply changing the above result to a’(t). But anyways through this we will end up with the same solution we get from solving differential equations.

[[curator]]
I'm the Curator. I can help you navigate, organize, and curate this wiki. What would you like to do?